____________
like the Marine's motto “...leave no man behind”
____________
I really hope that a representation of our New Brunswick
Teachers provide their thoughts on this article, as I am very aware that I am
poorly researched in this topic, however, as our newspaper editorials and government
is making all of their opinions public, why can’t I?
This Link does a pretty good job identifying how our middle school math scores are well
below the National level.
_______________
Almost 32,000 Grade 8 students in New Brunswick took the 90-minute test
in the spring of 2010.
Mean scores by province in mathematics
|
|
Quebec
|
515
|
Ontario
|
507
|
Canadian average
|
500
|
Alberta
|
495
|
British Columbia
|
481
|
New Brunswick
|
478
|
Saskatchewan
|
474
|
Nova Scotia
|
474
|
Newfoundland and Labrador
|
472
|
Yukon
|
469
|
Manitoba
|
468
|
Prince Edward Island
|
460
|
New Brunswick students scored an average of 478 compared to the national
average of 500. The standard for their grade level was 358.
_______________
I firmly believe that Math Scores are the best litmus test
on how we are doing across all of programs that our students are taking, as
there is no room in math for subjectivity.. right or wrong.. that is all.. Having
a national evaluation on History or Social Studies would be near impossible to
generate any analysis on how our education program is doing versus other
provinces. Therefore, I suggest that we can use our math rating as a general statement
on our entire curriculum.
I laughed out loud as I saw the justification from John
Grant McLaughlin (a UNB Math Professor) suggesting that our failing grade was a
result of socio economic factors, fewer international students (as I guess they
are smarter), teachers can’t teach math,
and that our students are not “inspired” by math.
Not inspired?? Show me a middle school student who is
inspired – ESPECIALLY about math, and for my extrapolation – education in
general. If we have a method to inspire teen angers – I think second to a cure
for cancer, the world will be a much better place.
Another common “excuse” is the fact that our children miss a
good number of days at school due to weather closures, or Teacher Professional
development days. Although this may be frustrating to those parents who see our
education as a daycare service, I stand firmly in a belief that if we added
two, or even three weeks of education to offset these days.. it would have ZERO
impact on the improvement of our provincial standings.
We look at the symptoms, and that is great for a
politician.. we can spend millions on addressing the symptoms and get votes,
and cut ribbons. We can write articles to the paper complaining about the
number of field trips.. we can pay millions to re-arrange the deck chairs on
the Titanic.. but these efforts, and actions (at massive tax payer expense)
have been going on for years – and we continue to have poor education for our
children.
So what is the cause? I am positive that it is a complex
issue, but I think the fundamental issue is the fact that it is no longer
acceptable to let a percentile of our students fail. More than ever, the pace
of the curriculum is slowed to a snail’s pace. Our curriculum and expectations
are progressively being tailored to the small percentage of the class of
students to those experiencing the most difficulty.
Pace, Content and
expectations are targeted and designed for a small number of students, who years ago, would simply
fail, and be forced to repeat the year. But now, for the love of god, like the
Marines motto “we leave no man behind”, our average and advanced students are
slowed to allow ALL to progress.
There is much more to the activity of teaching to the lowest
common denominator t than leaving a handful of stellar student bored and unchallenged - we are setting the
bar so low to accommodate the lowest, that the majority of the average students
now will strive only to that bar. The average student will achieve only what is
expected, and will not find internal motivation to exceed goals that have been
set for them. With the goals set only to make sure every student gets a passing
grade, we are setting a level of
performance well below what is truly necessary.
The solution? Accept the fact that the children with
challenges may be forced to repeat a year, sure this may seem cruel to the handful
of children this applies to, but is in not worse to strip the challenge and
education of most of our students..
Pick of the pace, raise the bar, and manage the few that are
unable to meet the requirements. The world, Universities, Trades will all
welcome the fact that our students have been conditioned to reach to bar, to
meet challenges, to accept occasional failure. Not a graduating class that
believes coasting is an acceptable result. Programming our children that they
need only be a bit better performer than the worst performer of the group will
not fare well in the fast paced challenging world that they are walking into.
No comments:
Post a Comment